AI’s Role in Economic Growth: Will It Create More Jobs Than It Destroys?

For decades, every major technological breakthrough has sparked debates about job displacement. The Industrial Revolution mechanized manufacturing, the internet revolutionized communication, and now artificial intelligence (AI) is reshaping work itself.

But unlike past disruptions, AI is fundamentally different — it automates both cognitive and manual labour, replacing human decision-making at an unprecedented scale and speed.

Will AI create more jobs than it destroys? Or are we heading toward an era where millions are left without viable employment? Let’s break it down.

The Hard Truth: AI Will Destroy More Jobs Than It Creates

Historically, technological shifts have displaced more workers than they benefited in the short term. But AI’s impact is even more disruptive because:

• Dual automation of mental and physical tasks: Previous revolutions mainly affected manual labour (e.g., textile workers during the Industrial Revolution). AI, however, is replacing both white-collar and blue-collar jobs. It can now handle 60–70% of tasks in fields like customer service, coding, legal analysis, and even creative industries like graphic design.
• Speed of displacement: Unlike past innovations that required large-scale infrastructure (factories, assembly lines), AI is software-based. This means mass deployment can happen instantly, across every industry, and on a global scale.
• Reskilling isn’t a realistic solution: The idea that displaced workers can simply “learn new skills” is overly optimistic. Shifting from a factory job to an AI-augmented role isn’t a simple leap — many lack access to advanced education, technical training, or the financial stability to undergo career transitions.

One clear example is the healthcare sector. AI is already reducing clinicians’ cognitive burden by automating medical documentation and data synthesis, cutting charting time by 30%. While this boosts efficiency, it reduces demand for medical transcriptionists, junior diagnosticians, and administrative roles. This pattern repeats across industries — AI boosts productivity but eliminates stable jobs.

The economic impact of AI is staggering: an estimated 300 million jobs are at risk globally, with advanced economies being the most vulnerable. AI isn’t just shifting roles — it’s eliminating entire career paths.

According to an IMF report, AI will affect 40% of jobs worldwide, with that number rising to 60% in advanced economies. Of those, nearly half will be negatively impacted, leading to lower wages, reduced hiring, and outright job losses.

via International Labour Organization

For over 200 years, predictions of mass unemployment due to technology have largely been proven wrong. But that doesn’t mean jobs weren’t lost — millions were. First, agricultural technology displaced farmworkers, pushing them into factories. Then, automation forced them out of factories, fueling the rise of a service-based economy.

Yet, despite these cycles of “creative destruction”, global employment has steadily increased, with more people working today than ever before.

But is AI different? Unlike past technologies that primarily augmented human labour, AI is designed to replace it. While new job categories may emerge — optimists argue — it remains unclear whether they will be enough to offset the massive displacement ahead.

The Optimist Argument: “AI Will Create More Jobs”

Despite these concerns, many argue that AI will ultimately create more jobs than it destroys, just like past revolutions:

• AI will drive new industries and job categories: Just as the Industrial Revolution led to factory work and the internet created digital jobs, AI is expected to generate new career opportunities. We already see demand for AI specialists, data scientists, prompt engineers, and robotics experts.
• Humans + AI = Augmented work: Rather than replacing humans, AI will serve as a tool to enhance productivity. Workers using AI assistants can work faster, produce higher-quality output, and innovate in ways previously impossible.
• Historical precedent: The invention of the automobile destroyed jobs in horse carriage manufacturing, but it created millions of jobs in automotive production, logistics, and infrastructure. The same logic applies to AI — some jobs will vanish, but new ones will emerge.

This perspective assumes AI will be an enabler rather than a replacement, helping workers transition into more complex and fulfilling roles. But does history really repeat itself in this case?

Why They’re Wrong…

The optimism around AI-driven job creation ignores several harsh realities:

• AI evolves faster than humans can adapt: Previous industrial revolutions spanned decades, allowing workers to reskill gradually. AI development cycles happen within months, meaning there’s little time for workers to transition. For instance, generative AI tools reached 100 million users in just a few months — far faster than any prior technology adoption.
• Not everyone can become an AI specialist: While theoretically possible, the transition from low- or middle-skill jobs to AI-focused careers is unrealistic for most people.
• AI’s economic benefits don’t trickle down: The majority of AI-driven productivity gains flow to corporations, not workers. AI-powered automation allows businesses to cut costs without hiring more people. Unlike the Industrial Revolution, where machines required human operators, AI can function independently.
• New jobs are often low-quality or niche: Many AI-generated roles — like content moderation, data labelling, and gig work — lack stability, fair wages, and career growth. In contrast, the jobs AI is replacing (e.g., accountants, paralegals, radiologists) are well-paid, middle-class careers.

As AI accelerates inequality, the economic model that supported previous job transitions may no longer apply.

The Future of Work: What Needs to Change?

If left unchecked, AI could widen economic disparity rather than drive progress. To ensure AI benefits society rather than just a privileged few, key structural changes are needed:

Governments must rethink labour policies:

• Universal Basic Income (UBI): A guaranteed income could provide financial stability for displaced workers.
• Shorter workweeks: Instead of eliminating jobs, businesses could redistribute work, allowing AI to complement human labour rather than replace it.
• Tax incentives for companies investing in worker reskilling: Encouraging firms to train employees in AI-related skills rather than opting for full automation.

Businesses must take responsibility:

• Instead of using AI purely for cost-cutting, companies should focus on workforce transition programs — training existing employees for new AI-augmented roles.
• Ethical AI deployment should be a priority — ensuring AI adoption enhances human labour rather than replacing it.

Society must acknowledge AI as an economic disruptor:

• AI isn’t just another technological advancement — it’s fundamentally restructuring the economy.
• Reskilling alone won’t solve the displacement problem. Instead, governments, businesses, and educational institutions need collaborative strategies to manage AI’s impact.

AI’s economic disruption isn’t about whether new jobs will emerge — it’s about who benefits and who gets left behind. Unless we rethink how wealth and opportunities are distributed, AI will concentrate power at the top while billions face economic insecurity.

Robert Solow’s 1962 essay — “Problems That Don’t Worry Me” was illustrated by a cartoon of a Solow-looking character whistling past a trio of straw men (presumably jobless ones).

The future of work isn’t inevitable — it’s a choice. How we manage AI today will determine whether it serves as a tool for progress or polarization.

________________

Thanks for subscribing! Follow me on X, Connect with me on LinkedIn!